Security Affairs
Dark Caracal Deploys New Go Malware With Ethereum-Based C2 Fallback|Australian Police Charge Two Over TeamPCP Credential Theft|Meta to Pay Up to $18B Over Teen Social Media Use|CISA Warns Water Utilities: Find Your Exposed PLCs Before Attackers Do|OpenAI banned Russian ChatGPT accounts backing covert influence operation|CISA Red Team Fully Compromised Two Critical Infrastructure Orgs|FBI Seizes China-Linked Hacking Platforms QScan and QTRouter Used Against Critical Infrastructure|U.S. CISA adds Gitea flaw to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog|88 ID Verification Breaches Show the Cost of Collecting Identity Data|WhatsApp Adds Stronger Security as Passkeys Hit 1 Billion|Operation Jackal: 58 Arrests Expose the Money Laundering Machine Behind Global Scams|Norway ’s Digital Government Infrastructure Hit by a new DDoS Attack|Dark Caracal Deploys New Go Malware With Ethereum-Based C2 Fallback|Australian Police Charge Two Over TeamPCP Credential Theft|Meta to Pay Up to $18B Over Teen Social Media Use|CISA Warns Water Utilities: Find Your Exposed PLCs Before Attackers Do|OpenAI banned Russian ChatGPT accounts backing covert influence operation|CISA Red Team Fully Compromised Two Critical Infrastructure Orgs|FBI Seizes China-Linked Hacking Platforms QScan and QTRouter Used Against Critical Infrastructure|U.S. CISA adds Gitea flaw to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog|88 ID Verification Breaches Show the Cost of Collecting Identity Data|WhatsApp Adds Stronger Security as Passkeys Hit 1 Billion|Operation Jackal: 58 Arrests Expose the Money Laundering Machine Behind Global Scams|Norway ’s Digital Government Infrastructure Hit by a new DDoS Attack|
Advertisement

Ad Placeholder

Full Width × 90

Breaking News

Fortinet FortiWeb OS Command Injection allows takeover servers remotely

Fortinet addresses a command injection vulnerability that can allow attackers to take complete control of servers running vulnerable FortiWeb WAF installs. An authenticated attacker could execute arbitrary commands as the root user on the underlying system via the SAML server configuration page. Experts pointed out that the flaw could be chained with an authentication bypass flaw that […]

fortinet FortiBleed

Fortinet addresses a command injection vulnerability that can allow attackers to take complete control of servers running vulnerable FortiWeb WAF installs.

An authenticated attacker could execute arbitrary commands as the root user on the underlying system via the SAML server configuration page. Experts pointed out that the flaw could be chained with an authentication bypass flaw that could allow an attacker

The vulnerability impacts Fortinet FortiWeb versions 6.3.11 and earlier, an authenticated attacker could exploit the issue to take complete control of servers running vulnerable versions of the FortiWeb WAF.

An authenticated attacker could execute arbitrary commands as the root user on the underlying system via the SAML server configuration page. Experts pointed out that the flaw could be chained with an authentication bypass flaw (i.e. CVE-2020-29015) to allow an unauthenticated attacker to trigger the vulnerability.

The vulnerability was reported by the researcher William Vu from Rapid7.

“An attacker, who is first authenticated to the management interface of the FortiWeb device, can smuggle commands using backticks in the “Name” field of the SAML Server configuration page. These commands are then executed as the root user of the underlying operating system.” reads the post published by Rapid7. “An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to take complete control of the affected device, with the highest possible privileges. “

The flaw could allow an attacker to deploy a persistent shell, install crypto mining software, or other malware families. If the management interface is exposed to the internet, an attacker could trigger the issue to reach into the affected network beyond the DMZ. Rapid7 researchers discovered less than three hundred devices exposing their management interfaces online. Let’s remind that management interfaces for devices like FortiWeb should not be exposed online!

Waiting for a patch that will address the flaw, users are recommended to disable the FortiWeb device’s management interface from untrusted networks.

Such kinds of devices should only be reachable only via trusted, internal networks or a secure VPN connection.

Below is the disclosure timeline for this issue:

  • June, 2021: Issue discovered and validated by William Vu of Rapid7
  • Thu, Jun 10, 2021: Initial disclosure to the vendor via their PSIRT Contact Form
  • Fri, Jun 11, 2021: Acknowledged by the vendor (ticket 132097)
  • Wed, Aug 11, 2021: Follow up with the vendor
  • Tue, Aug 17, 2021: Public disclosure via this post
  • Tue, Aug 17, 2021: Vendor indicated that Fortiweb 6.4.1 is expected to include a fix, and will be released at the end of August

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook

[adrotate banner=”9″][adrotate banner=”12″]

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, Fortinet)

[adrotate banner=”5″]

[adrotate banner=”13″]